They just dont offer the level of control you would with let's say an Ableton compressor or EQ, or even a Reaper Reacomp or Reaeq.Ĥ. Not to say Reason has horrible compressors/EQs (Reason actually has pretty good character boxes). Stock compressors EQs (Mclass devices) are a bit outdated compared to other DAWS. IMO here is what I think Reason falls short on:ģ. There are some areas Reason managers to deliver on (one of the better Daws for included instruments, comping, pitch correction) I'm not sure what props aim is at this point but if it wants to top other DAWs then it needs to focus.Įvery DAW you will find falls short in some areas. I mean lets face it, I don't have to have this stuff here, but its what keeps Reason from being a #1 hit DAW. Normally I can't stand most people's wants and "needs" in Reason compared to Ableton, but this is true guys. While Pulversizer is great what is lacking is a good workhorse compressor with lookahead, self sidechaining, more variable knee. The compressors IMO are even more behind. Compare with EQ8 in Ableton with 8 bands, mid side, variety of curves. Reasons stock compressor and EQs are dated. Reason has improved here but some features like no paintbrush, good curve system, keybinding system, note muting still makes this area somewhat weak compared to like FL Studio. The Rack is pretty much unchanged and needs an update to match the high resolution monitors of today. Reason's three different views look totally different. Compare to other DAWS that worked out these issues years ago. Now with VSTs, audio, and REs, it is normal to get glitchy playback. Reason 10 years ago was probably the most CPU efficient software out. I would like to hear from people who use REASON with other DAWs. In Korea I have very few users of Reason. However, some DAWs have a relatively large number of users. There are various daws, and every DAW has its own characteristics. ![]() I still use REASON and think it's usable, but there are many DAWs in the world Why don't they just want to make it the best daw out there in terms of features and make it as capable as the likes of Logic, Ableton, Cubase, Reaper and FL Studio?īecause if thy sort all the things out in one version, why are people gonna upgrade so soon ? There is a reason (no pun again) companys drag things out and dont give u what you want straightaway, i mean they could go away for two or three years and come back sorting all the probelems out but they need a constant income so they will do it in bits x What I also don't get is why they have to (so they said after the 10 release when they said they're listening) wait for a feature to be requested before they add it, or it seems that way. Yeah they'll add a feature that's very advanced, such as the Players or Pitch Correction whilst leaving other basic things out such as muting midi notes or autosave and you're right, many devices have been left as they are when a little improvement here and there could revitalise the device. I love what they do and in recent years PH has been more active with users and listening to requests so just to make that more clear, they have drastically improved in the user experience and request category They do listen, but sometimes they don’t go that extra mile, but they give enough that it’s worth the wait. I don’t mean to sound negative but this is how I have viewed how PH goes about features and requests. A semi modular synth could be a developers playground to see what works with fans. When they could revitalize Thor with a new oscillator type or filter type every now and again. Yet as time goes on they have left Thor as is. This would save many users from always pounding requests when we could just be using Reason :p And if many users make a request, they need to wait on release for a little bit implement then beta once more and then release. I think they need to make a synth, beta the synth. But they only let you use one user table? Weird but it’s still fun. They later add a few more modifiers and the ability of user tables. 3-4 as a wave sequence/wave morning wave table. They released it with only 16 wavetables and the ability to use env. ![]() ![]() They sometimes add a feature here and there, but for example they finally make a Reason version of modern wavetable synthesis. But they tend to release something and never go back and improve it. When it comes to their synths, they make some very inspirational synths. Automation curves and the ability to save preset automation shapes Automation is available but is still using straight lines only, Iv long hoped for the ability ableton just received. Midi editing is basic but gets the job done. But it lacks the advancements of recent years. Great ecosystem for quickly making songs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |